|
 |
|
Virginia
S. King. Costa del Sol.
Watercolor, 18" x 24".
|
The
Mainz Classification of Renal Cell Tumors
José
I. Diaz, MD, Linda B. Mora, MD, and Ardeshir Hakam, MD
|
The
Mainz classification is effective in distinguishing the histopathologic
and cytogenetic features of various types of renal cell carcinoma.
Background:
Tumors arising from the renal tubular epithelium
have variable characteristics and have been subject to a variety of histologic
classifications.
Methods: The authors describe
the distinct clinical, pathologic, phenotypic, and genotypic features
of different types of renal tumors.
Results: The Mainz classification
is now widely accepted because characteristic genetic alterations have
been demonstrated in each tumor type.
Conclusions: The increasing emphasis
on utilizing genetic characteristics of specific tumors is reflected by
the more widespread use of the Mainz classification for renal cell tumors.
Introduction
A
wide variety of benign and malignant neoplasms have been described in
the kidney. The tumors typically encountered in adults are rare in children.
Conversely, the tumors seen in children are rare in adults. In this
article, we review the pathobiology of the most common renal tumors
in adults. These are the tumors derived from the renal tubular epithelium,
all of which are included in the Mainz classification of renal cell
tumors.
Etiology
and Epidemiology of Renal Cell Tumors
Renal
cell carcinoma (RCC) is extremely rare in the first two decades of life,
rare in patients below 40 years of age, and most prevalent in patients
over age 60. The number of new cases of renal cell carcinoma in the
United States in 1996 was projected to be 30,600 with an estimated 12,000
deaths.1
Most
of the carcinogens that cause renal cancer are unknown. Smoking, obesity,
long-term use of phenacetin and acetaminophen, presence of kidney stones,
and exposure to cadmium, thorotrast, petroleum products, and other industrial
chemicals are important risk factors for developing renal cancer. Von
Hippel-Lindau disease is associated with RCC in one third to one half
of patients.2 RCC occurs earlier in patients with von Hippel-Lindau
disease. In addition, it is multiple or bilateral and metastasizes more
frequently. Whether polycystic kidney disease is associated with RCC
remains controversial; however, acquired renal cystic disease, which
typically occurs in patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis,
is strongly associated with RCC. There have been a few reports of RCC
clustering in families without von Hippel-Lindau disease.2
The relationship between benign renal adenomas and RCC is controversial
and will be discussed later.
The
Mainz Classification
RCC
was originally named hypernephroma because it was believed
that the tumors originated from adrenal rests due to the histologic
resemblance to the adrenal. In 1960, Oberling et al3 demonstrated
its origin from the proximal renal tubule based on the ultrastructural
features. The tumor was renamed renal cell adenocarcinoma
or renal cell carcinoma. For many years, RCC was considered
a single pathologic entity and was subdivided into clear, granular,
and mixed cell variants based on the cytoplasmic features of the tumor
cells. The term papillary renal cell carcinoma was used to designate
a subset of granular cell type RCC with exclusive or predominant papillary
architecture. While significant variability in clinical behavior was
observed in RCC, the old classification failed to provide good clinicopathologic
correlation.
In
1976, Klein and Valensi4 reported a subtype of renal neoplasms
with granular cell features, the so-called renal oncocytoma,
which appeared to have an excellent prognosis. Nine years later, Thoenes
and colleagues5 described another subtype of RCC with clear
cell features, which closely resembled the renal tumors experimentally
induced in rats.6 This tumor was named chromophobe
renal cell carcinoma. Shortly after, a new renal tumor was described
that appeared to originate from the collecting ducts.7 This
also had granular cell features and was named collecting duct carcinoma.
Overlapping of granular and clear cell features among tumors with marked
clinical, pathologic, and phenotypic differences promoted the need for
a new classification. In 1986, Thoenes and colleagues8 from
the Gutenberg University in Germany proposed a new classification for
renal tumors of tubular epithelial origin known as the Mainz classification.
This classification was still based on conventional histopathologic
criteria and included all the new entities described earlier.
The
Mainz classification is now widely accepted because several cytogenetic
studies9-12 have confirmed characteristic genetic alterations
on each tumor type. Today, RCC is no longer considered a single pathologic
entity. The term RCC embraces a group of renal cancers, all of which
are derived from the renal tubular epithelium but each with distinct
clinical, pathologic, phenotypic, and genotypic features. The Mainz
classification of renal cell neoplasms is presented in Table 1 with
the relative frequency of each tumor. The most characteristic histopathologic
and cytogenic features are presented in Table 2.
| Table
1. The Mainz Classification of Renal Cell Tumors
|
| Tumor
Type |
Relative
Frequency |
| Renal
Cell Carcinoma: |
| |
Clear
Cell |
70%
|
| |
Chromophil
(eosinophil, basophil) |
15%
|
| |
Chromophobe
(typical, eosinophil) |
5% |
| Collecting
Duct Carcinoma |
2% |
|
Renal Oncocytoma
|
5% |
| Table
2. Histopathologic and Cytogenetic Features of Renal Cell
Carcinomas |
| Tumor
Type |
Histopathology |
Cytogenetics
|
| Clear
Cell RCC |
-
Compact alveolar, tubular, and cystic architecture |
- 3p losses |
| |
-
Clear cytoplasm, low N:C ratio |
- 3:8 reciprocal translocation |
| |
-
Vascular stroma |
-
5q gains |
| |
| Chromophil
RCC |
-
Papillary architecture with aggregates of
foamy histiocytes |
-
Trisomy and tetrasomy 7 & 17 |
| |
-
Basophilic cytoplasm and low N:C ratio or
eosinophilic cytoplasm and high N:C ratio |
- Loss of Y chromosome |
| |
| Chromophobe
RCC |
- Compact solid architecture |
- Losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10,
13, 17, & 21 |
| |
-
Clear or eosinophilic cytoplasm |
|
| |
-
Prominent cell membranes |
|
| |
-
Great variability in cell size |
|
| |
-
Positive colloidal iron stain |
|
| |
-
150-300 nm cytoplasmic microvesicles |
|
| |
| Collecting
Duct Carcinoma |
-
Medullary location |
- Losses of chromosomes 1, 6, 14,
15, & 22 |
| |
-
Tubular and glandular architecture |
|
| |
-
Hobnail cells |
|
| |
-
Desmoplastic stroma
|
|
Renal
Adenoma
Small
renal epithelial neoplasms are commonly and incidentally found during
autopsies. Many investigators believe that these lesions lack the ability
to progress to RCC and are benign. However, since the same lesions are
not uncommonly associated with concomitant RCC, other investigators
claim that some of these neoplasms might progress to RCC. Methods to
distinguish the benign adenomas from the potentially malignant tumors
remain controversial.13
In
1950, Bell14 conducted an autopsy study and reported that
metastases were exceptional when renal tumors were less than 3 cm in
size. He suggested that these lesions should be considered benign adenomas.
With the advent of computed tomography scans, an increasing number of
small tumors (1 cm or even less) that had already metastasized were
reported.15 Therefore, tumor size is no longer considered
a reliable criterion. At the present time, most urologic pathologists
agree that there are no reliable criteria to distinguish benign renal
adenomas from RCC. Microscopically, histopathologic features of both
greatly overlap, and almost any histologic pattern described in RCC
can be encountered in benign adenomas. Although it is acknowledged that
many of these small renal neoplasms are probably benign, they should
be considered potentially malignant, regardless of their size, until
reliable diagnostic criteria become available. Tumors with clear cells
should never be accepted as benign adenomas. The ideal candidate for
a benign renal adenoma is a small and superficial tumor with tubular,
papillary, or mixed architecture and without clear cells or nuclear
anaplasia.
Renal
Oncocytoma
Renal
oncocytoma is uncommon but not rare (5% of the tumors derived from tubular
epithelium). While most tumors are incidentally found, they can present
as a palpable mass or with hematuria. Oncocytomas may resemble RCC clinically
and pathologically, and this resemblance may lead to radical nephrectomy.
However, conservative surgery is considered an adequate treatment since
true oncocytomas are always benign.16
Renal
oncocytoma has a characteristic mahogany appearance and often has a
central white fibrous scar (Fig 1). Although rare, necrosis may occur,
resembling RCC. Hemorrhage is common. Bilaterally or multicentricity
are common. Occasionally, oncocytomas are predominantly cystic.
 |
Fig 1. Renal oncocytoma. The mahogany appearance of the tumor contrast with the white fibrous scar in the center of the mast.
|
The histologic features are very characteristic. Strongly eosinophilic
tumor cells forming islands and tubules dominate throughout the tumor.
Tumor cells exhibit large and finely granular cytoplasm, uniform round
nuclei, clumped chromatin and small nucleoli (Fig 2). Bizarre, enlarged
nuclei may be scattered throughout the tumor, but mitoses are rare.
Oncocytomas sometimes extend into the perinephric fat or into venous
sinuses without affecting the prognosis. These two features are never
observed grossly. The differential diagnosis with eosinophilic
chromophobe RCC would be difficult without Hale’s colloidal iron stain,
which is negative in oncocytomas, or without electron microscopy (EM),
which in oncocytomas shows numerous mitochondria filling the cytoplasm
of the tumors cells (Fig 3).
 |
|
 |
| Fig
2. Renal oncocytoma. Eosinophilic tumor cells with large granular
cytoplasm form small aggregates and tubules. Note the lack of mitotic
activity and cytologic atypia (hematoxylin-eosin, x 600). |
Fig
3. Renal oncocytoma. The ultrastructural micrograph shows
numerous mitochondria filling the cytoplasm of the tumor cell. |
Few cases of metastatic oncocytomas have been reported.17 Retrospectively,
these tumors were most probably eosinophilic chromophobe RCC and were
easily mistaken with oncocytomas because Hale’s colloidal iron stain and
EM were not applied. When fulfilling all the diagnostic criteria described
earlier, oncocytomas are always benign and do not recur or metastasize.
Clear
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clinically,
this is the most common renal neoplasm seen in adults (70% of tumors
derived from tubular epithelium). This tumor can be as small as 1 cm
or less and discovered incidentally, or it can be as bulky as several
kilograms. Most often it presents with pain, as a palpable mass or with
hematuria, but a wide variety of paraneoplastic syndromes have been
described. Clear cell RCC might be clinically silent for years and may
present with symptoms of metastasis.
The
gross appearance is characteristic. The tumor is solid, lobulated, and
yellow, with variegation due to necrosis and hemorrhage (Fig 4). The
tumor might be well circumscribed, or it might invade the perirenal
fat or the renal vein. Cystic degeneration is common, but some tumors
are predominantly cystic (15%).18 The so-called cystic
RCC is more often multilocular and with clear cells, but it can
be un |